About Us

New Vision for a New World

Orthodox views of national security are challenged in a world connected by next generation networked communications.  The Internet has become a reality of the 21st century. Billions of individuals are connected today as never before.  Networked citizens — as citizens of nations and as planet citizens — are acting to shape a new 360° world.

LatLong

StratDem envisions new security perspectives

A 360° connected world and Internet era demand new ways of understanding and engagement. With this in mind, a Global Policy project in association with the Green Institute was initiated in 2005 with the publication of a Strategic Demands security brief written by Roger Morris and current Strategic Demands director Steven Schmidt.

Based on the initial Strategic Demands of the 21st Century policy paper, a conference was organized in Washington DC to propose new definitions of national security.

We subsequently launched Strategic Demands and an associated strategic initiative, GreenPolicy360. Over the years these projects have continued to develop a wide array of work intersecting Strategic Demands & GreenPolicy360.

Strategic Demands of the 21st Century_A New Vision for a New World

StratDem Mission

Our ongoing strategic goal is to develop “New Definitions of National Security” and add independent perspective and opinion to the contemporary national security debate.

We bring experience and a belief that the current Washington DC/New York/Boston corridor that holds most all foreign policy think tanks is limited in its politics (normatively competing for influence and positions under Democrat or Republican administrations).

Our independent perspective draws from thinkers both left and right, Democrat and Republican, as well as major minor parties such as the Greens and Libertarians. We consider several decades of polls that indicate U.S. voters have continued to trend toward identifying as “Independent”, neither Democrat or Republican. Over 40% of Americans now identify themselves as “Independent”.

Politics in the U.S. is profoundly changing. The Eisenhower 50’s era and its mushroom clouds of thermonuclear tests seem a distant memory, distant as the Vietnam war and its lessons are to most young citizens. The lessons of the Cold War have faded.

Capitalism prevailed, so goes what is now called ‘a meme’. Communism collapsed, over-extended, after one final decade-long war in Afghanistan. Now, the U.S. is deeply engaged in Afghanistan and deeply extended with trillions in war-related costs. Challenges to peace, the environment, economic disruptions, sustainable growth must all be addressed, but are not being recognized with the gravity they deserve.

The U.S. itself faces over-extension due to constant war-mobilization. Since 1990, the nation has been at war in the Gulf region. An estimated $4-6 trillion has been spent in Afghanistan-Iraq wars, a fourth of the total U.S. debt due to war appropriation spending beyond budgeted defense spending. The effects of the wars and war debt were a contributing source of the 2007-2012 economic collapse. The nation is still recovering from the costs of these wars, beyond direct spending and appropriations, even as a next phase of war in Iraq/Syra was announced in September 2014.

As the Mideast continues its decades long meltdown in which oil politics and Israel-Arab antagonisms have had a direct role, a broad spectrum of  broader security threats have arisen, a number of which directly relate to failed U.S. policies and misplaced priorities.

A post cold war nexus of global challenges, new old wars, and a new cold with Russia are presenting multiple strategic questions — the U.S. and NATO threaten action over the Ukraine; China rises as a world power and continues to advance its interests; re-alignments are shifting geo-politics; proliferation re-threatens with past treaties being put on hold. Nuclear players and warnings escalate amid regional and asymmetric hot spots.

Larger global environmental challenges are set aside as nations find themselves constrained by narrowed national interests, not common interests.

Within this complex set of reality checks, Strategic Demands sees our challenges as three-fold: Geo-political, -environmental and -economic. Geo-politics begin locally and nationally, then rise in an increasingly interconnected world to international concerns. “Think globally, act locally” becomes more than a maxim. Global and existential questions arrive in new form after previous years of brinksmanship and close calls as a nuclear sword of Damocles swiveled left and right above countries in every political orbit. Now come environmental threats and devastation that does not respect any border, boundary, edifice or human-made system.

Environmental impacts are added to the direct and indirect costs of war, the diversions of wars headlines and latest invasion, or incursion, drone campaign, secret force action, or deployment. The evening news takes our vision away from a world shaking with externalities, costs that have yet to be accounted for or confronted. Strategic Demands will begin to address this lack of foresight and the need to strategically address larger security interests.

Strategic Demands will address both the current crises and the longer term. We will add our bits of data and awareness to the online world, posting and sharing. In effect, we will be rolling our e-press and reaching out to today’s and tomorrow’s world in every corner, latitude/longitude, wired and wireless.

 

 

Strategic Demands will look at the ‘big picture’ and look to keywords-key phrases, ‘bursts’ and links, connections in the fast-evolving, democratizing Internet. We will access, edit, create and make available open source, open data from information troves that have sprung forth over the past two decades.

How one sees the world, beginning with our Internet address and geo-location, is a beginning point to participation in a worldwide economy and politics. When we’re online, we are shaping politics, government, and transactional markets — while governments watch and commercial interests monitor our metrics, patterns, and behavior. Billions of individuals are connected today as never before — a future shaped by networked citizens, ‘netizens’ — citizens of nations and ‘citizens of the planet.’ A global and local, national and interconnected worldview is possible and achievable.

Ours is a more complicated world, even as it is a more connected world.

“Think globally, act locally” is more than a maxim for Strategic Demands.

Strategic Demands sees global challenges as three-fold: Geo-political, -environmental and -economic.

What happens politically in any part of the planet has a rippling physics that impact other parts. Military actions, politics by ‘other means’, have effects and consequences that range far from fields of battle. Generational ‘blowback’ is not to be ignored as war and peace decisions are made. The interconnectedness that the environmental movement focuses on transcends narrow interests. Economic waves cross markets in an instant affecting all markets as, with every point globally, the world is brought closer by networked communication.

Initiatives in one community on one continent can become, via the Internet, a model for similar initiatives in communities globally. Forward-looking ideas and policies can be shared across borders.

New security issues are coming into view and Strategic Demands looks to meet these challenges with new definitions of national security.

The time has come for a new vision and new strategies for security.

Editor@StrategicDemands.com

 

 

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

 

Visit Strategic Demands Associated Site – GreenPolicy360

Planetcitizen.org

Climate News

● EarthSciencePolitics

New Definitions of National Security

ThinBlueLayer.com

Environmental Security

Earth Observations

Environmental Security, National Security

Earth Science Research from Space

Earth Right Now

 

 

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Share